I don't like science because I don't think it makes sense to put a definition on everything. It's a lot more exciting to think of things as mysterious.
The Nobel award occasions a unique celebration of the vision of science by the public at large. The prestige the prize confers today is largely due to the extraordinary diligence of the Nobel committees.
The hardest problems of pure and applied science can only be solved by the open collaboration of the world-wide scientific community.
When I investigate and when I discover that the forces of the heavens and the planets are within ourselves, then truly I seem to be living among the gods.
There are no shortcuts in evolution.
Science, for hundreds of years, has spanned the differences between cultures and between countries.
I would say keep supporting space flight, keep telling the public and the politicians why it's important to advance science and explore the galaxy. I encourage the Japanese to keep doing what they're doing.
Ever since I was little, I've always had a few science experiments going on.
I quite enjoy science fiction.
Growing up in the '70s and '80s, science fiction and especially fantasy had such a stigma attached to them. I felt so punished and exiled for being devoted to these things.
I did grow up with a really big interest in math and science; I liked it.
I cannot say how strongly I object to people using other people's writing as research. Research is non-fiction, especially for horror, fantasy, science fiction. Do not take your research from other people's fiction. Just don't.
The major thing is to view biology as an information science.
Science is only truly consistent with an atheistic worldview with regards to the claimed miracles of the gods of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
People are interested in science, but they don't always know they're interested in science, and so I try to find a way to get them interested.
When a person's religious beliefs cause him to deny the evidence of science, or for whom public policy morphs into a battle with the devil, shouldn't that be a subject for discussion and debate?
We should provide the meaning of the universe in the meaning of our own lives. So I think science doesn't necessarily have to get in the way of kind of spiritual fulfillment.
I cannot stress often enough that what science is all about is not proving things to be true but proving them to be false.
There were certain questions about the foundations of morals that advances in science all threaten to make more complicated.
Science is bound, by the everlasting vow of honour, to face fearlessly every problem which can be fairly presented to it.
The more thoroughly I conduct scientific research, the more I believe that science excludes atheism.
