I've long loved emerging markets airlines because they usually sell at bargain prices. The troubled history of developed market airlines unfairly taints these stocks. In the emerging world, they're growth stocks.
No apparent, perceived, or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.
I studied history when I was at school, at A-level, actually. I wouldn't profess to being very knowledgeable though, no.
Philosophy is tested and characterised by the way in which it appropriates its history.
Nowhere else in history has there ever been a flag that stands for the right to burn itself. This is the fractal of our flag. It stands for the right to destroy itself.
But when you are embodied in a location, in a physical plant, in a set of people, and in a common history, that constrains your evolution and your ability to evolve in certain directions.
In capitalist history, invasion and class struggle are not opposites, as the official legend would have us believe, but one is the means and the expression of the other.
I can read a newspaper article, and it might trigger something else in my mind. I often like to choose in historical fiction things or subject matter I don't feel have been given a fair shake in history.
I think the Lewis and Clark Expedition was the greatest undertaking in American History. I think landing a man on the moon pales next to it.
I believe in monogamy if that's what a couple decides upon together, but it all depends on the personal history and culture of the two involved.
The history of Christianity, therefore, must be of concern to all who are interested in the record of man and particularly to all who seek to understand the contemporary human scene.
We know something of the history of the spread of Christianity, but much passed from recorded memory and much was transmitted by tradition whose accuracy has been repeatedly questioned.
Revolutions are the locomotives of history.
History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.
The history of all previous societies has been the history of class struggles.
It is not history which uses men as a means of achieving - as if it were an individual person - its own ends. History is nothing but the activity of men in pursuit of their ends.
History does nothing; it does not possess immense riches, it does not fight battles. It is men, real, living, who do all this.
The writer may very well serve a movement of history as its mouthpiece, but he cannot of course create it.
I am not a fan of historical fiction that is sloppy in its research or is dishonest about the real history.
Every president, as he nears the end of his final term in office, thinks about his place in history.
But whenever history is in the making, there's some kind of intangible feeling.
