If it were a choice between putting ads on Wikipedia or shutting down Wikipedia, we would then very reluctantly consider putting ads on Wikipedia.
For all its shortcomings, Wikipedia does have strong governance and deliberative mechanisms; anyone who has ever followed discussions on Wikipedia's mailing lists will confirm that its moderators and administrators openly discuss controversial issues...
I'm quite good at taking in information so I voraciously inhale Wikipedia - which may have some things wrong in it, but I think is generally more information than we had before. Last tour we didn't have Wikipedia. And then Discovery Channel and Histo...
I did a series in Britain years ago called 'Skins,' and I remember my little sister telling me that I had a Wikipedia page that was talking about me. But then it got deleted because on Wikipedia anyone can write stuff, right? So I think that it got s...
You're just a regular Wikipedia aren't you?
Wikipedia has a way of compiling compendiums of information on subjects.
Wikipedia gets a lot of things wrong.
Wikipedia flourished partly because it was a shrine to altruism.
Wikipedia was a big help for science, especially science communication, and it shows no sign of diminishing in importance.
Wikipedia is a victory of process over substance.
The core of Wikipedia is something people really believe in. That is too valuable for the world to screw it up.
In the world of the Internet, there are many falsehoods. Anyone can write stuff on Wikipedia, and it doesn't have to be true.
I've been reading a lot of books on history, and watching a lot of educational TV. Wikipedia too, even though it is not reliable.
Happy Wikipedia Wednesday. Post a positive fact for proper Netiquette. NetworkEtiquette.net
I don't think Silicon Valley understands the power of Wikipedia, how it works, or the opportunities it represents.
The definition of marriage cannot be disputed. It's right there in black and white and it's been the same since the start of Wikipedia.
A Wikipedia article is a process, not a product.
We talked about the Internet and Wikipedia and how facts and history are being collectively created online.
Wikipedia is just an incredible thing. It is fact-encirclingly huge, and it is idiosyncratic, careful, messy, funny, shocking and full of simmering controversies - and it is free, and it is fast.
People take issue with individual aspects of Wikipedia all the time. But it's kind of hard to hate the general idea of a free encyclopedia. It's like hating kittens.
If you're reading IMDB, half of it's made up. You can't trust it or Wikipedia, which is just lies, lies!
