We don't regard any scientific theory as the absolute truth.
Scientific theory is a contrived foothold in the chaos of living phenomena.
God schedules a birthday, not man.
The deductive method is the mode of using knowledge, and the inductive method the mode of acquiring it.
The theory of evolution, like the theory of gravity, is a scientific fact.
Advertisements may be evaluated scientifically; they cannot be created scientifically.
The scientific argument advanced for intelligent design at the Dover trial, those arguments collapsed, scientifically and intellectually.
… scientific thought does not mean thought about scientific subjects with long names. There are no scientific subjects. The subject of science is the human universe; that is to say, everything that is, or has been, or may be related to man.
I am not a method actor, though I studied for a year with Lee Strasburg.
Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love.
I have no idea what 'method actor' means.
What is a better way to prove that your methods work than by winning? I have proved that my methods work.
A good scientific theory is one which is falsifiable, which has not been falsified.
One can not impede scientific progress.
We have learnt that the exploration of the external world by the methods of physical science leads not to a concrete reality but to a shadow world of symbols, beneath which those methods are unadapted for penetrating. Feeling that there must be more ...
When it repudiates a past paradigm, a scientific community simultaneously renounces, as a fit subject for professional scrutiny, most of the books and articles in which that paradigm had been embodied. Scientific education makes use of no equivalent ...
I emphasize this because some of my colleagues, for whose academic attainments I have great respect, argue" 'You assume too much; this is not proved; this is not strictly scientific. We disagree with your neurology and your psychiatry is misleading, ...
The best way to study is to go to the Cecchetti method for about a year and draw onto all the highest points and then put that into the general method.
I don't think ethical people deal with intimidation as a method to achieve success. Undermining someone's self-esteem isn't a method to achieve success.
For the progress of scientific knowledge will lead to a constant increase of expenditure.
A valid scientific theory is predictive, verifiable, and replicable. To me, that's beautiful.
