I'm not much of a math and science guy. I spent most of my time in school daydreaming and managed to turn it into a living.
To me there has never been a higher source of earthly honor or distinction than that connected with advances in science.
But man has still another powerful resource: natural science with its strictly objective methods.
What has become clear from the science is that we cannot burn all of the fossil fuels without creating a very different planet.
Mystery Science Theater is really a postmodern show, it's really derived of many influences.
A lot of the shows that really become hit shows are often demonstrated, like Mystery Science Theater.
More and more NFL players have been willing their bodies to science so that their brains can be studied even if they die of other causes.
I'm chairing a UNESCO committee on how to improve global Internet communications for science; help third-world people get onto the Net so they can be part of the process.
Well, they are critics of the Bush administration generally on the human rights record of the administration, and in particular, they are very, very critical of this use of science.
Science gives us a powerful vocabulary, and it is impossible to produce a vocabulary with which one can only say nice things.
Science fiction made me aware of how big and strange the universe was, leaving aside the whole question of aliens.
With acknowledgement of residues, we can be more easily prepared to grant the unit of science, the overlapping of disciplines, and the total coherence of all facts.
Many fiction writers who put the science in don't get it right.
When a person's religious beliefs cause him to deny the evidence of science, or for whom public policy morphs into a battle with the devil, shouldn't that be a subject for discussion and debate?
There were certain questions about the foundations of morals that advances in science all threaten to make more complicated.
Whatever science and philosophy may do for mankind, the world can never outgrow its need of the simplicity that is in Christ.
And the continuity of our science has not been affected by all these turbulent happenings, as the older theories have always been included as limiting cases in the new ones.
It was a shock to people of the nineteenth century when they discovered, from observations science had made, that many features of the biological world could be ascribed to the elegant principle of natural selection.
It seems true that the growth of science and secularism made organized Christianity feel under threat.
Don't confuse hypothesis and theory. The former is a possible explanation; the latter, the correct one. The establishment of theory is the very purpose of science.
Science and literature give me answers. And they ask me questions I will never be able to answer.
