Yes. I don't think it would be appropriate at this point to raise taxes on anyone, certainly not in 2011.
We need to get rid of the debt ceiling law. It's anachronistic and it's a problem.
As information technology restructures the work situation, it abstracts thought from action.
One problem with relying on existing concepts is that it could stifle innovation, weakening the film sector over time.
I brought one big question with me to Harvard. Why do smart companies fail?
Growth makes so many dimensions of management easier. It's when growth stops that things get tough.
An innovation will get traction only if it helps people get something that they're already doing in their lives done better.
Most people die with their music still locked up inside them.
Awareness requires a rupture with the world we take for granted; then old categories of experience are called into question and revised.
People can change the volume, the location and the composition of their income, and they can do so in response to changes in government policies.
You can't build an adaptable organization without adaptable people - and individuals change only when they have to, or when they want to.
An employee who's one of hundreds, rather than one of a few, is unlikely to feel personally responsible for helping the organization adapt and change.
The scenarios of biological or chemical warfare painted in detail by the American media during the months after September 11 only betray the inability of the government to determine the magnitude of the danger.
The clever, albeit fragile, coalition against terrorism brought together by the U.S. government might be able to advance the transition from classical international law to a cosmopolitan order.
What I object to the current government intervention in so-called 'solving the crisis', they haven't solved anything. They've just postponed it.
The income tax is flawed for a number of reasons - it discourages economic growth and encourages a bloated government.
The most important point is, in a time of crisis, there is no way out but for the government to be bold and aggressive.
At the end of the day, philanthropy can only ever be an adjunct to what governments provide. And government coffers need to be replenished.
Not all Modern Orthodox Jews, at the present juncture, identify with what the Israeli government does. In Israel many religious Zionists strongly oppose the government because of the disengagement.
One of the worst of errors would be the general admission of the proposition that a Government has no right to interfere for any purpose except for that of affording protection.
What got us out of the depression was capitalism, and we would have gotten out a lot quicker had the government not intervened.
