When you have a country that's been accustomed to government spending at a certain level, it is really hard to ratchet it back.
Free enterprise makes people prosperous, all people prosperous, and big government makes people poorer.
The problem is that when government controls the economy, those who can influence government keep winning, and everybody else just stays the same.
The government of Israel doesn't like the kinds of things I say, which puts them into the same category as every other government in the world.
At the end of the day, philanthropy can only ever be an adjunct to what governments provide. And government coffers need to be replenished.
Not all Modern Orthodox Jews, at the present juncture, identify with what the Israeli government does. In Israel many religious Zionists strongly oppose the government because of the disengagement.
The budget doesn't have much control over the government. Then again, the government doesn't have much control over the budget.
President Reagan was elected on the promise of getting government off the backs of the people and now he demands that government wrap itself around the waists of the people.
In our Constitution governmental power is divided among three separate branches of the national government, three separate branches of State governments, and the peoples of the several States.
It's the government's job to encourage entrepreneurialism and investment. Most importantly, it's the government's duty to inspire confidence.
Everywhere you look for comparisons of life under anarchy and life under government, life under government is less violent.
Instead of cutting waste, the Obama Administration is hurting workers. President Obama should stop protecting wasteful government spending.
Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.
History, in general, only informs us of what bad government is.
We don't need a weakened government but a strong government that would take responsibility for the rights of the individual and care for the society as a whole.
In no way am I supporting or suggesting that a Conservative government is a good thing, far from it.
Good government only happens when the people working in it do their jobs, and do them well.
It is not safe in the republican form of government that clannishness should exist either by compulsory or voluntary reason. It is not good for the government and it is not good for the individual.
Unless your government is respectable, foreigners will invade your rights; and to maintain tranquillity, it must be respectable - even to observe neutrality, you must have a strong government.
Every year, thousands of Californians flee that populous paradise for tax-eased small government oasis of America's red states.
Beginning to dismantle the Pentagon would save $1 trillion a year - a small government proposal if ever there was one.
