Hell hath no fury like a Democrat scorned.
Some Democrats deserve to be criticized.
Smaller government, more individual responsibility, more individual control creates more Republicans. More state power and ownership and control and top-down decision-making creates more Democrats.
Now, most of the time I'm going to agree with the Democrats and disagree with the Republicans.
Another tendency, which is extremely natural to democratic nations and extremely dangerous, is that which leads them to despise and undervalue the rights of private persons. The attachment which men feel to a right, and the respect which they display...
The early Mormons were even less concerned about ministerial training. On several occasions, a man heard a discourse, submitted to baptism and confirmation, received a call to priesthood, and was sent on a mission - all on the same day. Canadian Samu...
Democracy is not a good by itself. It is completely dependent upon the nature of the people, both for its efficacy and for its survival. One can say that a “democratic” people, if placed under a dictatorship, would be more “democratically” ru...
In almost every detail, when one examines it closely, it is not Democracy which makes the system work, but the Individual democrats who, in it, use their powers correctly and in the way that they were intended to be used. If those in power were not e...
In the final analysis, what is it that we call popular, democratic power? Beyond the expressed will of the people, as it is supposedly formulated, there is no appeal; here we meet the absolute, the universal, the indivisible, and the immovable. There...
Multilate. Ha Ha Ha,' said Nusswan, avuncular and willing to pretend it was a clever joke. 'Its all relative. At the best of times, democracy is a see saw between complete chaos and tolerable confusion. You see, to make a democratic omelette you have...
It is truth that liberates, not your effort to be free.
In this day and age, much of journalism is about right or left, conservative or liberal, and 'The Observer' is just that: an observer. It is about truth.
Loving someone liberates the lover as well as the beloved. And that kind of love comes with age.
That is the best case for Bush; that, among other things, he liberated Iraq. It is good enough for me.
Even a liberal reporter is a patriot, wants the best for this country. And people, your fair and balanced friends at Fox, don't fully understand that.
In doubtful cases the more liberal interpretation must always be preferred.
How can the oppressed, as divided, unauthentic beings, participate in developing the pedagogy of their liberation?
Does defending liberalism leave you friendless and perhaps wondering about your breath?
The liberals can understand everything but people who don't understand them.
I don't consider myself a Hollywood liberal, but I have my convictions and my beliefs.
Filmmakers and artists always thrive during more liberal times.
