I think the greatest challenge between child and parent is communication.
But picketing - picketing for or against something, and handing out literature - these are conspicuously formal actions. They have to be understood as indirect communication.
If you're a politician, you might want to learn the Buddhist way of negotiation. Restoring communication and bringing back reconciliation is clear and concrete in Buddhism.
Of all of our inventions for mass communication, pictures still speak the most universally understood language.
Where there is a sufficient social movement of self-reliant communities, there can be political change. There must be political change.
Without a possibility of change in meanings human communication could not perform its present functions.
When the government allocates monopoly rights to frequency, and there are only a handful in each community, it's picking the winners in the competition.
The instruction we find in books is like fire. We fetch it from our neighbours, kindle it at home, communicate it to others, and it becomes the property of all.
Nothing is insignificant in the history of a young community, and - above all - nothing seems impossible.
For computer communications, computers talk in little bursts. They're not continuous like speech.
Communism is the death of the soul. It is the organization of total conformity - in short, of tyranny - and it is committed to making tyranny universal.
Modernism, rebelling against the ornament of the 19th century, limited the vocabulary of the designer. Modernism emphasized straight lines, eliminating the expressive S curve. This made it harder to communicate emotions through design.
To design is to communicate clearly by whatever means you can control or master.
The answer is not to standardize education, but to personalize and customize it to the needs of each child and community. There is no alternative. There never was.
The ability to communicate with everybody, regardless of who are you are, is a great thing.
I do use texting as a great way to communicate quickly, but I don't Twitter or anything.
Small communities grow great through harmony, great ones fall to pieces through discord.
Truly great actors carry their characters in silence with them. They communicate without words the relationships that predate the movie.
The Paris Commune was first and foremost a democracy. The government was a body elected by universal suffrage.
What makes community organizing especially attractive is the faith it places in the ability of the poor to make decisions for themselves.
I think that films about faith made for faith-based communities have a certain tactic.