Over the centuries, monumental upheavals in science have emerged time and again from following the leads set out by mathematics.
For me it's been very exciting to contribute to the public's understanding of how rich and wondrous science is.
Science is a self-correcting discipline that can, in subsequent generations, show that previous ideas were not correct.
For science, the end of the evolution struggle is simply represented by 'survival.' As for the means to that end, apparently anything goes. Darwinism leaves humanity without a moral compass.
That science has long been neglected and declining in England, is not an opinion originating with me, but is shared by many, and has been expressed by higher authority than mine.
The imposing edifice of science provides a challenging view of what can be achieved by the accumulation of many small efforts in a steady objective and dedicated search for truth.
Much public thinking follows a rut. The same thing is true in science. People get stuck and don't look in other directions.
I developed that for a long time. I also developed 'Sugar Sweet Science' at New Line and that didn't happen. That was a boxing movie. And between all that there were a couple of other things.
The further a mathematical theory is developed, the more harmoniously and uniformly does its construction proceed, and unsuspected relations are disclosed between hitherto separated branches of the science.
Basic science provides long-term benefits for ourselves and our fragile planet and should be supported by all the world's societies.
Economics is a strange science. Our subject deals with some of the most important as well as mundane issues that impinge on the human condition.
In the forensic science course I took at university they used photographs of dead bodies. For ballistics they showed us a guy lying on the floor, and his head had burst.
I think there is a tendency in science to measure what is measurable and to decide that what you cannot measure must be uninteresting.
That which today calls itself science gives us more and more information, and indigestible glut of information, and less and less understanding.
If you look in 'The Science of Getting Rich,' you see no reference whatsoever to the 'law of attraction.'
Without renouncing the support of physics, it is possible for the physiology of the senses, not only to pursue its own course of development, but also to afford to physical science itself powerful assistance.
My training in Science of Mind had begun with my mother. She took me to a different church every Sunday, and she encouraged me to question the minister afterward.
The developing science departs at the same time more and more from its original scope and purpose and threatens to sacrifice its earlier unity and split into diverse branches.
Kids are different from adults. They are not as developed as far as brain science, controlling impulses, and maturity, and fall prey to all kinds of pressures.
Science in the modern world has many uses; its chief use, however, is to provide long words to cover the errors of the rich.
Science is the first expression of punk, because it doesn't advance without challenging authority. It doesn't make progress without tearing down what was there before and building upon the structure.
