Secretary Clinton has dramatically changed the face of U.S. foreign policy globally for the good. But I wish she had been unleashed more by the White House.
Here is my first principle of foreign policy: good government at home.
When there's downward pressure on growth, one choice is to adjust economic policy, increase deficits, relax monetary policy. That might have a short-term benefit, but may not be beneficial for the future.
I don't want foreign policy developed just by one party and ride roughshod over the other party.
American foreign policy and military might have opened an opportunity for the Gospel in the land of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
With the aid of this credit policy, however, Germany created an armament second to none, and this armament in turn made possible the results of our policy.
In the United States today, the Declaration of Independence hangs on schoolroom walls, but foreign policy follows Machiavelli.
Human rights is the soul of our foreign policy, because human rights is the very soul of our sense of nationhood.
Doctrines don't govern policy. They provide a conceptual framework by which policymakers approach their decisions. But there is no such thing as a doctrine that controls policy in every way.
During the past few years I have led a sometimes hard battle for German foreign policy.
The American foreign policy trauma of the sixties and seventies was caused by applying valid principles to unsuitable conditions.
You know, Arabs are critical of United States foreign policy, but they also associate the U.S. with democratic principles and opportunity.
The extra curricular activity in which I was most engaged - debating - helped shape my interests in public policy.
The goal of Australian foreign policy should be to promote the maximum harmony between the U.S. and China.
And, frankly, what happens out of Washington is, it creates a wind in my face, uncertainty over Obamacare, uncertainty over their tax policy, uncertainty over the regulatory policy.
I'm obviously aware that people are quite focused on the economy rather than foreign policy issues, but that is something that should and can be altered as people see the nature of the threats around the world that we face.
The overwhelming public sentiment in India was that no meaningful dialogue can be held with Pakistan until it abandons the use of terrorism as an instrument of its foreign policy.
I have a job to do on policy. And I think that's what people want their governor to do. Not politics, policy.
Conservative policies have on the whole worked - insofar as any set of policies can be said to 'work' in the real world. Conservatives of the Reagan-Bush-Gingrich-Bush years have a fair amount to be proud of.
While all of these are important and significant events, it is the United States' foreign policy that furthers the advancement of freedoms and rights for women that is the most striking for me.
The only foreign policy advice I heard from China was when they said to Sudan, 'Don't go back to war.' That's all they said. They didn't push anything else.
