I find it very offensive when the government tells me what I can and cannot watch. Censor yourself.
Well, I have also believed in empowering the individual and believe there is a degree of inertia in big government that hampers the ability to respond to a rapidly evolving crisis.
If you ask people do you think that government should spend less money than what it takes in, most people agree with that.
The realities of the modern global economy require government to play a substantial role in ensuring the national and economic security of the people.
People in Oklahoma don't wake up every morning wondering what the government is going to do for them.
It's up to any government to decide how to react to the denial of basic human rights anywhere in the world, including Egypt.
What I object to the current government intervention in so-called 'solving the crisis', they haven't solved anything. They've just postponed it.
To sit back and say, 'Oh, we're going to let the government do whatever they want, right or wrong,' is giving up.
Most of the energy of political work is devoted to correcting the effects of mismanagement of government.
Democratic forms of government are vulnerable to mass prejudice, the so-called tyranny of the majority.
Today there are not even enough fruits and vegetables in this country to allow all Americans to follow the government guidelines to eat five to nine servings a day.
Challenging vested interests requires a government's full commitment.
Just in general, any government throughout history hasn't really wanted its people to be educated, because then they couldn't control them as easily.
When the government violates the people's rights, insurrection is, for the people and for each portion of the people, the most sacred of the rights and the most indispensible of duties.
On the acquisition of Louisiana, in the year 1803, the attention of the government of the United States, was early directed towards exploring and improving the new territory.
There is no government in Europe where ministers go through that kind of confirmation process, which in fact is modeled on the way the U.S. cabinet members are confirmed.
Our ability to make a decision about the declaration is hampered by the British government being reluctant to give us the clarification which we require.
Healthcare should be between the doctor and the patient. And if the doctor says something needs to be done, the government should guarantee it gets paid for.
All I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey.
Most people I know I think agree and even many theists agree with this. We don't want government involved.
The Constitution says that government isn't supposed to be infusing religion into our society, and so I asked to have that upheld.
