I'm not gonna name names, but sometimes when reporters are talking, it gets a little boring because I don't have any jokes to tell because the questions are so serious.
What is the effect of unlimited coinage of silver in this country? and I invite your attention to this particularly, because it is a question of vital importance.
Most Tea Party activists consider Obama a big-spending liberal. Some even question his eligibility to be president.
The question is whether voters, particularly independents, believe that Obama truly values personal liberty and responsibility as much as the government-bought safety net.
I got interested in the question of literacy because writers are always moaning about why more people don't read books.
If you want to be a cop, it's not for everybody, no question about it, but there's no place like New York City.
People say 'I want to be rich'. The question is, 'Are you willing to do what it takes?'
It's interesting because a lot of people that stop me on the street now, and they talk about 'The Wire,' and they all have the same question: 'How come they took that show off the air?'
Everybody has 24 hours and the question is, what do you do with your 24 hours? That's what makes everybody equal.
And the big question for the West, of course, and to the Europeans is, what other countries, which were formerly part of the Soviet bloc, should be incorporated into western institutions?
Questions of absolute good and evil are much better not opened to public debate these days, when so few people are sure of their absolutes
What you do in this world is a matter of no consequence, the question is what you can make people believe that you have done.
To address questions of scientific responsibility does not necessarily imply that one needs technical competence in a particular field (e.g. biology) to evaluate certain technical matters.
Writing detective stories is about writing light literature, for entertainment. It isn't primarily a question of writing propaganda or classical literature.
There are still so many questions to answer. When you look at any part of the universe, you have to feel humbled.
Why are empirical questions about how the mind works so weighted down with political and moral and emotional baggage?
The question of afterlife disappears, when we start to recognize the fact that we did not existed before our birth and the same will happen after death.
The question shouldn't be 'Are we guilty about our colonial past;' it should be 'Why aren't we more guilty about our corporate present'?
The question I wanted to answer was, could I train my mind to be happy the same way one trains one's body?
I always wanted to do a Hollywood story. The thing about actors, though, is that they go through a streak of roles. The question is, what's in between?
One big question that's come up is: Has autism increased on the mild side of things? I don't think so - they've always been here. Some of this is increased detection.
