Quote by: Avital Ronell

Now, what if Others were encapsulated in Things, in a way that Being towards Things were not ontologically severable, in Heidegger's terms, from Being towards Others? What if the mode of Dasein of Others were to dwell in Things, and so forth? In the same light, then, what if the Thing were a Dublette of the Self, and not what is called the Other? Or more radically still, what if the Self were in some fundamental way becoming a Xerox copy, a duplicate, of the Thing in its assumed essence?


Share this:  

Author Bio


  • NameAvital Ronell
  • DescriptionAmerican philosopher
  • BornApril 15, 1952
  • CountryUnited States Of America
  • ProfessionWoman Of Letters; Psychotherapist; Philosopher